
I study at Anna University.It is considered to be a prestigious Engineering Institution in our country.Infact according to the India Today Colleges Survey this year it was the 8th best college in India only next to the IIT's.
Well it's a fact to be proud about and the varsity is indeed a remarkable and humungous institution that has 250 private colleges under it's purview.But the Varsity had been rated based on it's four constitutent colleges.
These four are
1.College of Engineering,Guindy
2.Madras Institute of Technology(MIT)
3.School of Architecture & Planning
4.A & C College of Technology
The above mentioned institutions are considered among the best in Chennai and every aspiring engineer would love to study in one of these institutions.
I am not aware about the other three institutions but as far as College of Engineering,Guindy(that's where I study)is concerned there are several chinks in its armour.Poor Infrastructure,dilapidated laboratories & classrooms,a largely lackadaisical and irresponsible faculty are just some of the problems.
Hence when there was a change in the Vice Chancellor this year many expected some changes.There was surprise and expectation.People were surpriseas he was the youngest person to be ever chosen as a VC.He was just 50,an alumuns of this College and had worked as a professor for several years at this very institution.What made it even more pleasing for me was the fact that he was from our Department,Mechanical Engineering.He had worked with our President A.P.J.Abdul Kalam and had given up a lucrative job in US to come back serve his country,atleast that's what he claimed.And well many expected him to revamp this institution partially if not completely.
Just after his swearing in,as with all elected representatives,he made tall claims,claims thated included a promise to "revolutionise education in Tamil Nadu" .Few weeks after his appointment he came over to our department and promised state of the art equipment,electronically equipped classrooms and blah blah.
Well it's been 6 months since his appointment and forget "state of the art equipment" he hasn't even replaced the malfunctioning fan in our classroom.
But what he has become notorious for are his decisions that are nothing short of authoritarianism.Sample these
Decision 1:-Students are required to wear only formal clothing.T-Shirts and Jeans are prohibited.
Explanation:-For boys it ws to make them accustomed to the demands of the industry.You can't wear jeans to your work place?Can you.I read in a magazine that some IT companies allow you to come in casuals on fridays.Ram this is for you.Please answer
For girls it was to prevent "distraction among boys".Hmmm what's that all about??
Decision 2:-Movies and other entertainment activites like singing and dancing are banned at cultural events
Explanation:-Movies corrupt one's mind.Dancing and Singing are waste of times.Children should concentrate on their studies.
Decision 3:-Students should not walk or sit in groups inside the campus.
Explanation:-Waste of time.Go read you fools!!!
Decision 4:-This is the most important of them all and the main purpose I am making this post.Cellphones are prohibited in classrooms and other academic areas.They had initially banned Camera Cellphones due to the DPS MMS scandal .But now the ban was on all cellphones.
Explanation:-Students waster their time sending SMS and don't pay attention to classes.
But the ban wasn't monitored and students hadn't stopped bringing cellphones.But all that changed on 14th december when classes resumed after semester holidays.Students were randomly picked up and had their pockets checked.Cellphones were seized and warnings were issued.
But weren't cellphones only banned inside classrooms.What about canteen and playground?Well it seems cellphones are banned everywhere.Well students realised that it was time to stop bringing their cellphones to classes and some even started realising the intention of this decision.
But things only seem to be getting worse.In an inexplicable move the varsity officials decided to raid hostels yesterday night and seized all cellphones.For god sakes what's the fault in having cell phones in your room.
You can justify the prohibition of cell phones inside classes but hostels???Are we supposed to be studying 24 hrs a day??What about students wanting to talk to their parents?Well everyone is supposed to use the booths inside the campus.The booths are few and far apart.What this has resulted in long queues outside the booths.May be this doesn't have anything to do with the cellphones at all.It could be our VC has been given a kickback by the telecom companies operating inside our Campus.
Now sample some of the explainations given by the Dean and VC.They claim that 4 years isn't sufficicent for B.E and that you need to keep studying all the time and that Cellphones serve as a distraction.For god sakes which age are you people living in??Merely prohibiting cellphones is not going to enthuse everybody to study hard.Studying and learning are intuitive and can't be enforced.Even before cellphones were banned substantial number of students used to go the library.I am pretty sure that the number even after this action would remain the same and won't change dramatically.Why don't you accept cellphone as a technology we have to live with.
What I do feel is that these are nothing more that politically intentioned activities.Our VC is believed to be a sychophant of PMK.PMK is a political party that is quite vociferous in it's opposition against anything modern.It has protested against the use of english,pre marital sex, and god knows what else.It's believed that our VC was appointed because of his links to the PMK leader and he may just be paying his debt back to the party by enforcing their orders.
Vice Chancellor is a post of great reputation and responsibilty.A person appointed to this office is expected to perform his duties with impeccably with great diligence and sincerity.Our VC seems to be doing that but he is focussing on the wrong front.It would be much more advisable if he diverted his attention to more pressing issues on the educational front and desisted himself from further tinkering with student freedom.